All I care about is getting the best photos for you possible. I don't care about beauty rest, I don't want to be checking my watch while great moments are happening behind me, and I don't want you to worry about my schedule. Right from the start, you get everything you need for gorgeous, comprehensive wedding photography, with NO limit on time and NO limit on images taken. And there are no hidden costs; your images are yours to integrate into your life and keep safe for future generations.
All wedding packages include:
Full-day coverage with Ryan and an assistant photographer
Your own password-protected and customized Web site
A day-of slideshow, allowing for a set of images available within days after the wedding!
All files in high resolution on hard drive -- no watermarks
Everything you need for coverage and peace-of-mind for $5,500 (plus applicable sales tax).
We also offer a wide range of extras, from engagement shoots (which come with a $250 print credit for couples who book a wedding with us) to a hilarious and fun portable photo studio. Any physical products sold by our studio are guaranteed to be awesome, and if they come from the printer not-awesome for some reason, we send it back and make sure it is awesome.
Full price-sheet available upon request
show hide comments
Adrian Charles - A cheap, fast prime. Nikon 30 mm f/1.8?
Andrew Lusk - 35mm 1.8?
Mark Gregory - 24-70mm f2.8?
brett maxwell - 200 f2!
Josh Mitchell - 28mm f/1.4D
Ryan Brenizer - @Brett: Haha, if everyone wants a free bicep workout.
Ryan Brenizer - @Josh: I wish.
Marlo - Perhaps the remake of the 18-200mm?
Paul Benjamin - I can only assume it’s the ne 70-200mm f2.8. My logic is as follows…
Not the 50mm f1.4 you’re a Sigma user and so you couldn’t unreservedly reccomend the nikkor.
24-70mm 2.8 is not so awesome on APS-C
17-55mm is the opposite.
14-24 is great but a bit of a speciality lens…
Perhaps one of the micro nikkors, or a new 85mm everything else either works on FF or APS-C or is a speciality lens…
Larry Chua - 70-200 VR II
Dominik - 50mm 1.8!
Adam Shingleton - I want to know what it was!
C.F. - 85mm f1.4……
Bill Reynolds - New? 16-35 ƒ4.
Reworked? 24-120, 135/2 or 180/2.8.
Wish list: any ƒ3.5 or ƒ4 zoom, such as 16-85, 24-105, etc. — for walkabout
#haitirelief
John LaPlante - Ryan, love your site…would really like to know what lens you’re talking about…I have been looking at your wedding pics, but haven’t seen too many posted with what would be a 70-200VRII…so I’m curious…what be this lens?
Ryan Brenizer - @John: The 35mm f/1.8: http://www.enduserblog.com/2009/09/review-nikon-35mm-f18-dx.html