Comments on: Mystery Must-Have Lens Arrived! http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/ "Work is Love Made Visible." --Kahlil Gibran Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:27:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ryan Brenizer http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-1317 Ryan Brenizer Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:12:48 +0000 http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/?p=348#comment-1317 @John: The 35mm f/1.8: http://www.enduserblog.com/2009/09/review-nikon-35mm-f18-dx.html @John: The 35mm f/1.8: http://www.enduserblog.com/2009/09/review-nikon-35mm-f18-dx.html

]]> By: John LaPlante http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-1316 John LaPlante Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:11:32 +0000 http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/?p=348#comment-1316 Ryan, love your site...would really like to know what lens you're talking about...I have been looking at your wedding pics, but haven't seen too many posted with what would be a 70-200VRII...so I'm curious...what be this lens? Ryan, love your site…would really like to know what lens you’re talking about…I have been looking at your wedding pics, but haven’t seen too many posted with what would be a 70-200VRII…so I’m curious…what be this lens?

]]> By: Bill Reynolds http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-919 Bill Reynolds Sun, 17 Jan 2010 01:34:35 +0000 http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/?p=348#comment-919 New? 16-35 ƒ4. Reworked? 24-120, 135/2 or 180/2.8. Wish list: any ƒ3.5 or ƒ4 zoom, such as 16-85, 24-105, etc. -- for walkabout #haitirelief New? 16-35 ƒ4.

Reworked? 24-120, 135/2 or 180/2.8.

Wish list: any ƒ3.5 or ƒ4 zoom, such as 16-85, 24-105, etc. — for walkabout

#haitirelief

]]> By: C.F. http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-262 C.F. Sat, 03 Oct 2009 04:57:39 +0000 http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/?p=348#comment-262 85mm f1.4...... 85mm f1.4……

]]> By: Adam Shingleton http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-180 Adam Shingleton Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:01:57 +0000 http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/?p=348#comment-180 I want to know what it was! I want to know what it was!

]]> By: Dominik http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-137 Dominik Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:46:37 +0000 http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/?p=348#comment-137 50mm 1.8! 50mm 1.8!

]]> By: Larry Chua http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-134 Larry Chua Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:39:55 +0000 http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/?p=348#comment-134 70-200 VR II 70-200 VR II

]]> By: Paul Benjamin http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-133 Paul Benjamin Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:22:21 +0000 http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/?p=348#comment-133 I can only assume it's the ne 70-200mm f2.8. My logic is as follows... Not the 50mm f1.4 you're a Sigma user and so you couldn't unreservedly reccomend the nikkor. 24-70mm 2.8 is not so awesome on APS-C 17-55mm is the opposite. 14-24 is great but a bit of a speciality lens... Perhaps one of the micro nikkors, or a new 85mm everything else either works on FF or APS-C or is a speciality lens... I can only assume it’s the ne 70-200mm f2.8. My logic is as follows…

Not the 50mm f1.4 you’re a Sigma user and so you couldn’t unreservedly reccomend the nikkor.

24-70mm 2.8 is not so awesome on APS-C

17-55mm is the opposite.

14-24 is great but a bit of a speciality lens…

Perhaps one of the micro nikkors, or a new 85mm everything else either works on FF or APS-C or is a speciality lens…

]]> By: Marlo http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-121 Marlo Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:41:40 +0000 http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/?p=348#comment-121 Perhaps the remake of the 18-200mm? Perhaps the remake of the 18-200mm?

]]> By: Ryan Brenizer http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-120 Ryan Brenizer Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:45:42 +0000 http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/?p=348#comment-120 @Josh: I wish. @Josh: I wish.

]]> By: Ryan Brenizer http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-119 Ryan Brenizer Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:44:40 +0000 http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/?p=348#comment-119 @Brett: Haha, if everyone wants a free bicep workout. @Brett: Haha, if everyone wants a free bicep workout.

]]> By: Josh Mitchell http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-118 Josh Mitchell Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:44:39 +0000 http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/?p=348#comment-118 28mm f/1.4D 28mm f/1.4D

]]> By: brett maxwell http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-117 brett maxwell Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:33:31 +0000 http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/?p=348#comment-117 200 f2! 200 f2!

]]> By: Mark Gregory http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-116 Mark Gregory Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:31:17 +0000 http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/?p=348#comment-116 24-70mm f2.8? 24-70mm f2.8?

]]> By: Andrew Lusk http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-115 Andrew Lusk Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:27:58 +0000 http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/?p=348#comment-115 35mm 1.8? 35mm 1.8?

]]> By: Adrian Charles http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/2009/09/mystery-must-have-lens-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-114 Adrian Charles Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:26:33 +0000 http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/blog/?p=348#comment-114 A cheap, fast prime. Nikon 30 mm f/1.8? A cheap, fast prime. Nikon 30 mm f/1.8?

]]>